Wednesday, 20 July 2011

Are the chances development this from what pregnant while you nurse and use the jerk from method?

Are the chances development this from what pregnant while you nurse and use the jerk from method?

My son rotated only 3 months old, and I still have, no birth control withdrew at, because I don\'t have any insurance at this point, I had medicaid, but it 6 weeks after baby. I weiß, that nurses doesn I, works \'t as a form of the birth control for everyone, but I also know that if you nurse 100 percent and don\'t supplement at all there, is alleged, very few opening on you, that become pregnant. Do we use also the jerk from method so that what the chances of me, that become pregnant, are, you think? I Hafen\'t to theückbekommen my period still, so that I always am worried.

Additional details

As well like a side note, since the baby\'s credit, I cannot use any condoms. Für will bleed any reason, where I did of sting, as using a condom. Not certainly why, but we tried even ky-Gelee and it still rubs me there and causes much pain.

2



from NewCastl...

Best answer chosen by Asker

There is a chance, but I would question it.

I wanted to say, that I had Medicaid for my pregnancy, and as it finished, they transferred me to another program of the blanket family planning. I place auf\'t has the name of the program, got only a letter there, that boasted,ß this was done, and they will send a letter again in one year, as it is time to it, you apply, I was told before they moved me, that they cover also Mirena (that is well 5 years long). I Hafen\'t made much since it with it... well, ahem.... you müssen sex has to become pregnant, and we have really much lately, not going on it.

The number, that is letter on my FL Medicaid for the family health line, is 1-800-451-2229. Hope, that helps.
Asker \'s Rating:
Asker \'s Comment:
Thank so very much, I called number this and she/it told me, where going is, so that I can get this. I am so glad because they said, thereß she/it would cover, approved every FDA birth control.
Save to! ! RSS

Other Answers (10)



from Mel, I know several women personally, who became pregnant, while I nursed. It is no form of the birth control für everyone. The große matter is, if of SieWiederpflege, maybe you don\'t get your period, maybe you don\'t recognize so that you are any time for proper pregnant.

If you want to risk types no further pregnancy, I would propose any form of real birth control.

from Dell, I became pregnant, while nurses twice I,... the second time was I also on birth control. Jerk from is ungefähr 85 percent effective, if it is done completely.

In most states family planning is materials for low income families freely. Es\'s then more cheaply is it to softness from birth control, by nine months pr, to deliver änatale worry, for the state.... and you should be capable to get test boxes from your midwife. Bemühen you itself the repute and asking. I lost my insurance für a few months, and mine was glad to give me, that a couple packs.

Source(s,:

Student midwife

from Mel Nursing works as B.C. as it, you yearn as it, is done every 4 hours and at the clock. It is 90 percent effective.
I would use a condom until you get back your periods (two cycles) and the Fertilty Awareness-Methode then try where you pursue your periods and your temperatures. It will let you known, if you höchst fertile is, when you don\'t want to become pregnant, you avoid, you love to do at this time.

through bird Flippin\'s, that I would propose to use condoms just in case. The jerk from method isn\'t fool proof. ICH\'m, the gegenw,ärtig my 14 months as a nurse old works, exclusively not still, because he/it gets solids, and last week found out that I am pregnant. Therefore es\'s völlig possibly, to become pregnant, during working as a nurse.

through nmoonglo.... a very good chance! The jerk from method is as our first came in order to be and 100 percent, nursing is no form of the birth control at all. As soon as your Körper itself regulates, it will ovulate again!

Go to planned parenthood or purchase condoms......

from Kari 100 percent of chance that you can be, during Brustfütterung-dont, pregnant nursing is no form of the birth meant against troll for everyone, although arrives any dont menstruation there, that jargon gets you pregnant reception an examination.

from Lovelyki... what is, your chances,... well un getting on Friday of my ultrasound because a due date, because we didn\'t have ANY idea, even has expect dont we we. Nursing of 100 percent and using of condoms and, but never got a period because un working as a nurse... or with it i thought! frühfrüh december remained I to the bathroom continuously back and noticed, that this is a pregnancy symptom. Geprüft and sufficiently certainly un pregnant. Never, a period got so that we have NNOOOOOO earthly idea, if un fällig or far like at i is. Therefore watch from, care and condoms and a baby about my stomach! His/its I never guaranteed and place wei really auf\'tß, as I been able to avoid it, exclude you well..... this is not, gonna happens.
my baby is only 11 months old, and with this new baby, it will do 4 children in 5 years.... man un TAKES CARE OF!

through? Glücklich? I weiß the chances not, but hopes you allow a discount of your worries I, that this helps,: I am the same boat in practical and nurse my almost 4 month old and used only the extendable method since his/its birth, I felt PMSy, but never got my period. I took schließlich two days ago a pregnancy examination, and it was negative. But I learned my teachings as it had spoken with my gyno,: she/it said, thereß of nursing for birthcontrol not reliable is, if your baby takes a pacifier, or sucks others on EVERYTHING than the breast. , To say superfluously, that I me on B.C. - pills got. Ask your WHETHER, whether she/it ready wäre, to give you several months of free tests of her/its/their office.

through my angel\'s mommy, I heard about people, who become pregnant, while I nursed, and I got pregnant using from method the extraction. My husband and I did the same matter as I nursed, and I didn\'t becomes pregnant, but I don\'t recommend it on all Fälle. There always is a chance. I actually took a Schwangerschaftspr per month onceüfung, because my period gets didn\'t I, until my baby was 8 months old, and I nursed the whole time. I weiß, that it sucks in need of a certain type of birth control, only another matter injustice, with the healthcare-System in order not to have any insurance particularly as a nursing mother when you ask me., but I propose you, thereß types any type of protection use. And if you become pregnant, it will be difficult, für a while, to tell, because of Sie\'wieder of not getting of your period, and a nursing mother\'s symptoms are very similar to pregnancy: Fatigue, sore breasts, and so on and so on
And I don\'t know if you want types another baby of this soon. I know didn\'t for myself! Glück.

through mystic_e.... IF you meet the criterions for Lactational method(LAM amenorrhea, it is at least so effective as the birth control pill, and granting to some statistics more effectively, particularly, because you would be on the small pill, and as a new mommy, you are not likely in a real routine.

The departure method, if is followed the rules, is as effective as condoms for preventing pregnancy.

Of course failure, to follow, that the rules reduce the effectiveness of any method of the birth control.

The combination of LAM and departure would be they for resembling as combination pill and condoms. Which becomes as schit regards öne close to zero although it depends on it of course how the methods are used reliably.

If you can use no more LAM, you could consider, "periodic abstinence" aka "the rhythm method, to use. But the calendar was based, rhythm method is für mommies not immensely effective that continues menstruation only because of the cycle irregularities. But using saliva or urine ovulation prediction are very effective. Temperature, this, oversee, and physical signs are not far too effective, according to sleep schedules and the person\'s precision, that they do.

If you want to use condoms, you could try the one without spermicide. ICH\'m allergic and allergies können at every time happens. Inflammation and bleeding können a sign of the allergy is. Bemühen you not-spermicidal, but lubricated condoms therefore. If you use, is zuscaustic-like lubrication sure, that it is sure to use with condoms. It could be also a latex allergy, if there das\'s the caseß you female condoms or non-latex man condoms could use, however, these methods are not to be found, all so effective ones hard.

Be very careful if you, contraceptive foam, consider jelly to use film, diaphragms, cervical caps or the shield of meadow, because maybe you to the these methods effectively makes spermicide allergic is, and many of them are done out of latex /

/ wiki/Lactational.
Nursing of infertility

For women, who meet the criterions, presented below, LAM is 98 percent - 99.5 percent effective during the first six months postpartum. [1]

* Nursing must be the infant single, or almost only, sources of the nutrition. With the Füttern from formula, pumping instead of the nursing[2], and, to feed solids everything, the effectiveness of LAM reduces.
* The infant must during the day and at least every six hours with night at least every four hours nurses.
* The infant must be less as six months old.
* The mother didn\'t need to have any period after nach-partum 56 days, as deciding of fertility, becomes nach-partum-Dose 56 days ago to bleed, ignores.

[processes you] Ecological nursing

Ecological nursing is a stricter form of LAM, that is developed by Sheila Kippley, one of the couple\'s originators, the association connected. Studies showed, thereß it in the first six months postpartum a 1 percent of failure installment has, and a 6 percent of failure installment before the woman\'s first postpartum-Menstruation. [3][4] this strainers standards from is ecological nursing as the LAM-Kriterien of some different one(s):

* Nursing must be the infant\'s single source of the nutrition. no formula, none pump, and, if the Säugling less as six months old is, no solids or the water with all.
* The infant must be calmed with the breast, not with pacifiers or bottles or through placing a finger into the mouth.
* The infant frequently must be nursed. The standards für LAM are a bare minimum; bigger frequency is better. Sucking should not-nourishing suction einschließen, if the infant marks the mother and nurses not only as a means of the nutrition. From Fütterungen, to begin, is irreconcilable with LAM.
* Mothers must sleep in the same bed with her/its/their infants in order to take into account to work as a nurse throughout the night.
* Mothers doesn\'t need to be separated from her/its/their infants. This schließt substitute for mother like babysitter and even stroller or still something, who comes between mother, one and physically you turn with her/its/their child. BabywearingBabywearing (using material messengers) means tangible stimulation between mother and child and increases, you grab to the breast. Every separation of the mother becomes the effectiveness decreases ecological breast feeding.
* Mothers must take daily naps with her/its/their infants.
* A mother didn\'t need to have any period after nach-partum 56 days to bleed nach-partum-Dose 56 days ago, is ignored.

[processes you] Return of the fertility

Return of the menstruation, that changes following birth among individuals everywhere. Ever näher a Frau\'s-Verhalten is standards of ecological nursing, the later, in the average to the strainers, that will return her/its/their cycles. Average return of the rule für women, who follow, that all seven criterions are 14 months after birth, with any Berichte-Sein as soon as 2 months, while as late as 42 months is others. [Quotation needed] Couples, that distance of 18 to 30 months between children wwe little, can often reach this alone through nursing.

Although the first nach-partum-Zyklus sometimes is anovulatory and the likelihood reduced to become again pregnant before the credit of a nach-partum-Periode, following cycles almost always are ovulatory and must therefore be held fertile. But some women find, thereß of nursing itself even with fertility mixes in, after ovulation began again. Luteal führt being gradually to short through, that to endure pregnancy, an usual example is.


ImIm light of it demonstrated effectiveness, the moral decency must be questioned by certain claims about natural family planning. For example, the FDA-Verbraucher f startedür May 1985 an article, that presented, "natural family Planning or rhythm" as he/it from "very variably a valued effectiveness had, revealed medical advisors of the FDA-Verbraucher 53-86 percent .13 correspondence with the editors and AMERICAN department of the health and humanely services maybe, that the basis for it is two Latin American studies very low figure. One was a calendar rhythm study in Colombia almost completely. 14 and the other were a comparison between the ovulation method (OM) and the Sympto-Sympto-Thermal Method (STM), that also through some of the same people, that in one something similar study is involved in Los Angeles, in Colombia was done. 15

The Colombian calendar rhythm study was led in six birth controls, centers and had many problems. The entire Pearl installment was 47.0 pregnancies per 100 women years, that to a 53 percent of Effektivitätsrate translates.

The rhythm investigators studied also the effectiveness of the pill in that resembles Colombian birth control center and reported a Pearl unplanned pregnancy installment of 10.5 or a 89.5 percent of effectiveness installment.

So, the FDA-Behörde used a study, that a 89.5 percent of effectiveness installment for the pill and a 53 percent of effectiveness installment for calendar rhythm reported. But they ignored the Colombian f 89.5 percent of numberür the pill and reported figure, supposedly from other sources, only a 99 percent. Indeed, they reported not even a 89.5 to 99 percent of area in Effektivität for the pill; they reported about the individual highest figure. This can morally and schön is named?

DasDas of the FDA, to claim low effectiveness for NFP, this not over method failures reports, used Colombian OM-STM comparison study and intently completely on user effectiveness. With the Lebenstisch-Methode of the statistics, there was a net pregnancy installment of 24.2 percent für OM-Benutzer and 19.8 percent for STM-Benutzer. In sense on them/her/it the pregnancy installments were older Pearl formula per 100 women years the follow-up phase for OM-Benutzer and 26.0 for STM-Benutzer in 33.8 during the one year.

As the authors reported, "the results of this study point it out on it, that these two methods of NFP cannot be considered simple methods of the family planning, but it cannot be gained as a new lifestyle, that requires alterations of sexual behavior, in a short period of time.. the degree motivation for it, to follow periodic abstinence, is brought in connection with cultural factors, that makes abstinence difficult, to practice in Colombia."

Exactly. DiesDies became also in the previously quoted fdemonstrated ünf-Nations STM, you study this so markedly as the North American different the results of Colombia in it was, European, and Asian believes that they were treated separately. 16 however, if the installments of 94.5 percent of entire Verwendungseffektivität and 85 percent of space bar effectiveness uses, is quoted by this study, such figures include the Colombian results, and would be higher, if they didn\'t do.

It is so, that if you want to quote very low effectiveness installments for any form of NFP, you drive to Colombia, among birth control pros well known. If however, it is moral, für a North American public, to write, and quotes only the Colombian studies and ignores, the North American and European studies, that is much more relevant?

EsEs should also be noticed that quoted the represented 86 percent as the high end of the selection, because NFP almost actually is the low end of the selection of the single federally financed American STM-Studium. 17 like previously erwähnt, the authors find a 100 percent of method effectiveness installment and a 85 percent of user effectiveness installment for the Sympto Thermal Method.

In the introduction into the FDA-Artikel, the author noticed that the selection of the effectiveness could change as couples either followed, or didn\'t follow the rules. It is no excuse to say the FDA only the figures for her/it für groups want reported, that contain Zufalls-t,

No comments:

Post a Comment